|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeBooksNonfictionPhilosophy |
|
|  |  | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
On Aristotle and an Aardvark Feb 17, 2010 This book arrived in great condition as the seller indicated. I haven't had a change to read it yet, but if it is anything like Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar, I am sure I won't be dissapointed.
Not as good as their first Sep 06, 2009 I didn't like this as much as Plato and a Platypus. It may be, in fact I suspect it very much is, that while it's fun to joke and think about philosophy, I take politics more seriously. Oh well. If you can laugh more easily about politics than I you may enjoy it, but, in all honesty, the rhetorical tricks used by wingers and nutjobs don't make me think of funny jokes - they just make me angry.
Recommended: Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar . . .: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
A Funny Book May 10, 2009 A Funny Book
This is a very funny book. Cathcart and Klein manage to teach a little philosophy along with the humor. They seem to understand their subject and they make it fun for the reader.
I enjoyed this book even more than their other, similar, book:
Aristotle and an Aardvark Go to Washington
I enjoyed this book and wholeheartedly recommend it to others.
Skewering political windbag was never funnier! May 04, 2009 I loved "Plato and a platypus" and am working my way through the series. I was literally doubled over laughing at "Plato/platyput". Although the positions the authors endorse are quite undeniably left of center throughout the book (what could you expect from two men who spent a good span of their life studying philosophy?) I still found it hilarious and real page turner. I will have to buy the next one.
1 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Move on May 03, 2009 I read the whole book believing at some point would move past the ad hominem attacks on Bush, such as comparing him to a monkey. But sadly the book is just a catharsis bashing of George Jr. and Sr. and even Barbara. At some point even to most anti-Bush reader will have to tell the author to "move on,".
Interestingly, the only two examples he uses that the average reader will recall from memory is Bill Clinton's definition of what "is" is, and the famed Washington politician, Johnny Cochran's "if it don't fit you must acquit". Apparently Bill Clinton was technically logically correct therefore not doublespeak but Johnny Cochran's catch phrase was doublespeak. And if you were in doubt the author rehashes the whole O.J. trial at length.
But the main point of the author's running commentary from the Bush examples is that the "surge" in Iraq was really an "escalation" and it's illogical to believe it will work. Just makes the whole work dated.
To someone who may want to read the book for an historical perspective; I will offer one gem from the author. The following oft said line is a fallacy, "Those who don't study history, are doomed to repeat it." So don't bother.
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|